« June 2011 | Main | August 2011 »

July 29, 2011

Will Farmers Pay for Compost?

I just finished a column that will feature in next month’s magazine that will talk about marketing compost in into the agricultural sector. I had some preamble and other text that hit the editing floor so to speak. Not wanting to waste these words I present some of them to you as a kind of “B-side”.

According to Statistics Canada Canadian residents and businesses send about 26 million tonnes of waste to landfill annually. Assuming that 20% are organic wastes it means that just over 5 million tonnes of organic waste go to landfill annually. Furthermore, assuming that about 60% of that is food waste it means that hypothetically about 3 million tonnes of food waste goes to landfill or about 85 kilograms for every Canadian (enough to make every food bank cry).

About 2.5 million tonnes of organics are diverted annually in Canada and in rough terms this equates to about a 33% capture rate. If it was assumed that all of this was composted and for argument’s sake that 50% of incoming feedstocks became compost we produce about 1.25 million tonnes of compost annually or about 35 kilograms for every Canadian.

If we applied it at a modest application rate of just 10 tonnes/hectare we would need only 125,000 hectares to consume all compost produced. If no organic waste was landfilled and it was all composted and applied to agricultural land we would need only 375,000 hectares to consume all compost produced. There are about 70 million hectares of farm land in Canada.

It would seem pretty straightforward. The challenge has been developing the correct approach so that farmers understand the benefits of compost but more importantly that they believe this benefit is worth enough money for them to open up their wallets and buy it.

What do farmers need to buy? What can composters sell and how should they sell it?

Read more in next month’s magazine.

July 25, 2011

Free Willy, for real

In the environmental trade press we have an expression that we normally share with new editors and writers: “None of the three ‘Fs’ please: no fur, fins or feathers.” This is a shorthand way of say, we’re a practical industry magazine that offers technical and engineering solutions to pollution and waste management problems; stick to articles that help people do their job (i.e., reach the plant floor) and stay away from GreenPeace-type stuff about saving animals.”

I generally stay away from the three Fs in my writing and editing for the magazines for which I’m responsible, but once in a while a wildlife preservation story catches my attention that I really have to share, and think my blog space is the best place to do it.

So, please find below a news release I just received about an issue I care about, and that is the captive whale and dolphin display industry, and a new documentary that claims to expose brutality and exploitation. My own opinion is that one day soon we’ll view displays and shows featuring whales and dolphins much the way we currently view Victoria-era bear-bating street shows, as cruel and barbaric.

You can watch the film for free online by following this link:

http://www.afallfromfreedom.com

(There is a trailer for the movie and also a link to watch the film online for free. You can also download the movie or buy a DVD.)

Here’s the news release:

New Film Exposes the Long and Controversial History of Sea World and the Entire Captive Dolphin and Whale Display Industry

SAN FRANCISCO, July 25, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Sea World is responsible for the death of thousands of dolphins and whales, so states former Sea World biologist Dr. John Hall. That is the thread of the first comprehensive documentary film to explore the sordid history of the captive whale and dolphin display industry. A Fall From Freedom, an 82-minute film produced by San Francisco-based EarthViews Productions, includes interviews with scientists, marine mammal biologists, former trainers, activists, and current and past marine park representatives. It is available for viewing free of charge on its website, http://www.afallfromfreedom.com

Narrated by Mike Farrell (M*A*S*H, Providence), A Fall From Freedom digs deep into the history of the captive dolphin and whale industry. Topics covered in the film include:

Sea World representatives secretly promoted the Japanese dolphin drives where thousands of animals are driven to shore and brutally killed, in order to provide their parks with replacement animals, says Dr. John Hall, former Sea World biologist.

There is no educational value to having whales or dolphins in a captive environment, states former Sea World biologist Dr. John Hall and former Sea World killer whale trainer Dr. John Jett.

Contrary to the claims of many marine parks and aquariums, captive killer whales die far more frequently and at a far earlier age than they do in the wild, says Dr. Naomi Rose, biologist for Humane Society International.

Sea World has been involved in illegal and unethical actions to assure their parks are well stocked with killer whales, states former Sea World biologist Dr. John Hall.

The Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks and Aquariums has worked tirelessly to reduce government oversight on the health and well-being of captive whales and dolphins, states Dr. Naomi Rose.

Sea World representatives have claimed that whales and dolphins are not highly intelligent, sophisticated, and social animals. Dr. Lori Marino, a leading expert on killer whale intelligence and social dynamics, asserts that their intelligence and social dependence is second only to humans.

Sea World and other marine parks claimed that the rehabilitation and release back to the wild of Keiko, star of the Free Willy movie, was a failure from the start. Dave Phillips of the Free Willy-Keiko Foundation argues that the project was a rousing success, which proved that these animals can be taken from captivity, rehabilitated and returned to the wild.

A Fall From Freedom is a comprehensive history of facilities worldwide that hold whales and dolphins for public entertainment. The film was sponsored by Friends of Animals, Humane Society of the U.S., Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, BlueVoice, the American SPCA, The Summerlee Foundation, the Donald Slavik Family Foundation, and The Campbell Foundation.

EarthViews Productions has been producing environmental documentaries for nearly 40 years, including Where Have All the Dolphins Gone?, a one-hour film on the killing of dolphins during tuna fishing operations, hosted by the late George C. Scott, which was broadcast primetime on Discovery Channel and was partly responsible for all U.S. tuna canners accepting only dolphin-safe tuna. Its other films include The Free Willy Story: Keiko's Journey Home, a primetime Discovery Channel original program, narrated by Rene Russo, and a primetime TBS Special, A World With Dolphins, hosted by Bridget Fonda.

Contact:

Stan Minasian
Executive Director/Senior Producer
EarthViews Productions
Fort Mason, Quarters 35N
San Francisco, CA 94123
415 775-4636
delphinus@aol.com
http://www.afallfromfreedom.com
http://www.earthviewsproductions.com

July 21, 2011

Dalton, It's called "WORKING WITH" !!!

Just down the road from me in Kananaskis the provincial Energy Ministers are wrapping up their three day meeting. A key agenda item was a national energy policy.

With a number of provinces holding elections in the next 12 months, the political posturing for the home audience is a primary concern. Ontario is taking it to the extreme with Dalton McGuinty and Ontario’s Ministry of Energy, Brad Duguid, upsetting the apple cart.

In Kananaskis this week the national energy strategy was thrown a curve ball by Ontario. The province refused to sign on to a communiqué that called for the Alberta oil sands to be deemed; “a responsible and major supplier of energy to the world”.

Duguid got on his high horse and was quoted saying: “We [Ontario] just weren’t comfortable with the wording that the oil sands are sustainable and responsible”. Now, isn’t it bad enough that we have outrageous claims being made by environmental factions from around the world who know nothing about the oilsands? But to have one of our own provinces feed the flames is, in my view, a low ball tactic and completely unacceptable.

Yesterday at the Premiers’ meetings in Vancouver, McGuinty went a step further. He is reported to have objected to what he called the preferential tax treatment for development of oil and gas projects, suggesting that Ontario’s clean energy industries and initiatives should be receiving the same treatment.

Now that is a good way to stir up the traditional east-west animosity in a hurry. Premier Stelmach of Alberta suggested that McGuinty’s comment “is not the leadership our citizens expect” and the leader of the Wildrose Party in Alberta, Danielle Smith, challenged McGuinty on the billion-dollar bailouts the auto industry received recently.

McGuinty is now doing damage control. His green energy policies are under attack from all quarters. By conveniently targeting the oil sands, he aims to deflect criticism by attacking the perceived benefits that Alberta receives. He also suggested that Ontario is doing a better job on the reduction of green-house gases.

Politics, just politics. Dalton should know better and he should exhibit a greater degree of statesmanship.

I have developed a leadership workshop called: “WORKING WITH”. It is an interactive journey for managers with a program dedicated to helping individuals develop their personal leadership skills. After more than thirty-five years managing people, coaching athletes and striving to find solutions to various challenges I have learned that the solution is not to throw rocks or blame others.

Leadership is building on the strengths of each individual or, in this case each province, to find mutually beneficial strategies to move the country forward. Think about it Dalton!

www.trashedpoliticalgarbage.com
TRASHED! How Political Garbage Made the United States Canada’s Largest Dump

July 18, 2011

US debt threatens environmental programs

The high-stakes political showdown between Republicans and Democrats/President Obama in Washington over the 14 trillion debt and the debate about raising the legal debt ceiling should be of interest to anyone concerned about environmental issues, because as the United States sinks further and further into debt, there will be less and less money available to spend fixing environmental problems.

I recommend readers watch the documentary "I.O.U.S.A." or at least the free 30 minute version on You Tube (here):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_TjBNjc9Bo

I've come to believe that within my lifetime the USA will cease to be a significant world power because of its debt level, the trade imbalance, and (most importantly) the refusal of politicians to do what’s necessary to balance the books.

Americans have a very simplistic belief that they will always "do alright" no matter what, because that's how it has been in the past. I think that belief will be their undoing. No one is prepared to take the 'scorched earth" steps required to get out of debt. The 'coup d’état" that Wall Street performed on the US government a few years ago (that led to the bank bailouts – and which was so well documented in the movie "Inside Job") has made things much worse.

Canada must, I believe, build stronger ties with Europe and other nations and not depend so heavily on its neighbor to the south, which is starting the circle the drain.

Anyway, watch I.O.U.S.A. and decide for yourself. (And pay attention to how much federal spending goes to the military!)

July 11, 2011

Best Management Practices for excess soil

The issue of soil recycling (e.g., excess soils from construction and demolition sites) is picking up steam, notably in Toronto where members of a subcommittee of the Ontario Environment Industry Association (ONEIA) and others attended an information session and participated in conference calls on Best Management Practices (BMP) of excess soils. Kathleen Anderson of Ontario’s environment ministry has been coordinating some of this conversation.

The ministry has been commended for bringing forward BMP proposals as the development of plans and tracking of soils is worthwhile. According to a summary of one presentation, a number of concerns and issues have been raised, such as:

- provide Soil Mapping to assist with soil management in a regional context (as the Dutch have done)
- reliance on two Qualified Persons (for source site and receiving site) seems unwieldy
- issues with financial assurance: how calculated? payable to whom (municipality or third party)?
- interface of large and small sites will result in complexities
- definition of “intended use”: Dutch have a three year limitation on soil banking
- need to support objective, as Dutch have, that slightly contaminated soil can be reused
- public consultation is unnecessary if ministry criteria have been met (this will serve only to delay the process)
- Ministry guidance required to ensure that a consistent approach is taken by municipalities across Ontario
- certain municipalities indicated that public consultation is included in their by-laws but agreed that provincial guidance is needed for suitable fill locations (e.g., not on an aquifer)
- procurement identified as a continuing problem for contractors: risk is placed on private sector but might not have access to testing documents
- procurement: receiving sites are not identified by municipalities (cost implications)

During a question period, Kathleen Anderson indicated that the ministry has had preliminary discussions on the proposed BMP with other ministries but that feedback from MTO, MOI and MNR would be sought.

A municipal survey tabled at the June 29 meeting -- Municipal By-law Review -- revealed that only 23 of 85 municipalities have a relevant by-law that mentions soil quality. Of these 23, 14 provide a description of unacceptable material without referring to either the EPA or specific soil quality criteria under O.Reg. 153/04 (as amended). Eight refer to the EPA without a specific reference to soil criteria under O.Reg 153/04. Only one municipality out of 23 makes specific reference to O.Reg. 153/04, Table 1 standards for fill. As a result of this survey, three recommendations were made:

1) form a provincial-municipal-industry working group to develop a consistent approach for soil management in municipal by-law and procurement practices,

2) province to provide guidance to municipalities on specific regulations and applicable tables to be used in by-laws, and

3) develop a protocol for contractors and developers that are generating and receiving soils at site but are not subject to the Record of Site Condition.

Parties interested in Best Management Practices for excess soils should contact ONEIA and follow progress on this important file in the coming months. Soil is a valuable resource worth recycling that should not simply be hauled to landfill disposal.

Visit www.oneia.ca

July 8, 2011

Learning to Fly

I like it when things work out. London, Ontario's Try Recycling (www.tryrecycling.com) is turning 20.

Lately I have been listening to a lot of Pink Floyd. This is the result of an accidental itunes box set order and the 170 songs that are now on my ipod. It amazes me how fresh their efforts still sound today.

I have set up a playlist with the song Learning to Fly my current favourite. As I listened to it today I reflected on the party I would be attending this evening. I thought the song, which can be interpreted either literally about flying or trying to reach and exceed your goals, was apt. Given Try Recycling ‘s owner Jim Graham’s fascination with flight made this song an even more fitting juxtaposition.

Into the distance, a ribbon of black
Stretched to the point of no turning back

I have been hanging the waste sector (including with Try Recycling) long enough that I am seeing other organizations and companies hitting this milestone. Twenty in the life of a business is like 40 in human years. You have survived your childhood and uncertain teenage years and early adulthood to enter and proceed through the rest of your life. You have started to figure things out and you know where it is that you need to go. And while you don’t always know how you are going to get there you know with providence and a bit more sweat that you will.

God keep my eyes from the circling skies
Tongue-tied and twisted just an earth-bound misfit, I

Today Try Recycling receives and recycles 100,000+ tonnes/year of construction and demolition wastes. When they started twenty years ago on the outskirts of London no one cared what happened to this waste stream. They managed this waste stream when pretty much no one cared. As it remains today they compete against the cheaper option of landfilling. It is from this tenuous position and financial reality that they have hewn a business from scratch to something that is viable and growing.

A flight of fancy on a windswept field
Standing alone my senses reeled

I think of the all the simple efforts they have put into making their company work, and this simplicity is the key lesson learned. They work in bowels of a worked out gravel pit. There are no buildings and their methods of separating out the various construction and demolition materials are deceptively simple. They have learned to find multiple markets for their recycled products, such are the ongoing vagaries of commodities that are one day worth money and the next day become a cost.

By keeping things simple, developing tight cost models and especially by being diligent to their craft they have survived.

To dream unthreatened by the morning light
Could blow this soul right through the roof of the night

They have of course more than survived. They have thrived in their market and are making extensive forays, not just in Southwestern Ontario but beyond.

Today what Try Recycling does is better understood. Their customers understand the choice they can make between recycling their wastes or landfilling them. More often now the choice is for the former.

Try Recycling has taken flight and on this their 20th anniversary are poised to take it to the next level.

The soul intention is learning to fly
Condition grounded but determined to try

TRY Recycling Celebrates 20 years!!!!
Since 1991 TRY Recycling Inc. has been operating as a multi-purpose facility providing collection and processing of construction and demolition waste for the province of Ontario along with the composting of leaf and yard waste materials. Through our extensive research and development programs we are able to process premium recycled products on-site that are available for sale at all of our locations. In addition, TRY Recycling manages a network of waste recycling sites on behalf of various municipalities throughout Ontario. You don't have to look far to find us in your area.


CANADIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM - IT'S JUST FINE

I took a little unscheduled break this week.

For the last three years I have been living in Canmore, Alberta. I was hiking last Saturday morning in these awesome mountains (Will and Kate just stayed at the Skoki Lodge in nearby Lake Louise on Wednesday, the weather has been spectacular, and I know they were blown away). While hiking I had, what I would call, a discomfort in my chest.

My family has a huge history of heart problems; my father died of a heart attack and both my brothers have had major cardiac problems. Notwithstanding that I eat well, work out regularly and keep my weight in check, I have always been aware that the hereditary genes could affect me. So, off I went to Canmore’s hospital emergency room, just to be safe.

Because of the fantastic quality of life here in Canmore, we have some of the best medical doctors in the country. The emergency doctor was not satisfied he had the answers so he talked to a cardiologist at the Foothills Hospital in Calgary. Within an hour of arriving at emergency, I was in an ambulance (for the first time in my life) for the fifty minute ride to the cardio unit.

I will try to make this short. Within hours of arriving at Foothills Hospital the medical team had ruled out a heart attack, however, we were all very aware that something had caused the problem. The next day imaging pictures of my heart had been taken combined with a stress test. The test results were fine but something was still there and I was given the option to leave with some new medications but an angiogram was recommended. Early the next morning I was on an operating table looking at pictures of my heart. The doctors found an artery with a 90% blockage and, thirty minutes later, a stent was inserted and the blockage was fixed. Here I am, the following morning (today), back here in Canmore writing this blog.

Every nurse, doctor and supporting staff at the Foothills Hospital was outstanding. My message this morning is where can anyone expect better service?

I am well aware of the treatment my brother has had in Ontario with his problems over the years, including a heart bypass and more, so I know that this calibre of treatment in our medical system is not reserved just for Alberta. Our Canadian medical system can, and does, provide world-class care when you are in trouble.

Yes, we talk about wait times in emergency rooms, and delays in scheduling for hip replacements and other treatments as we grow older. But the reality is, sitting in an emergency room for a few hours to get checked for a bad cold or a sprained ankle, or some other non-life threatening problems is not the same as the system responding to potential life threatening concerns. In my experience, when it counts, the system rises to the occasion and does the job. We are very lucky to live in Canada.

So, I had a little tune up, another million miles to come and I’ll be back hiking later today. As the doctor said, keep up that healthy lifestyle, I can’t do much about my family genes.

www.trashedpoliticalgarbage.com
TRASHED! How Political Garbage Made the United States Canada’s Largest Dump

July 6, 2011

Restore the Will not to Waste

(See also yesterdays blog post Where there is a Will there is a Goodwill)

The waste audits continue.

It is clear as I sift through wastes that the definition of what is waste is pretty fluid. It is a function of what we generate and how we choose to deal with it.

If I were a psychologist investigating the psychology of waste generation I would focus on identifying the moment when what was a possession is dispossessed and crosses the threshold to become a waste. More specifically I would investigate the motivations inherent in that moment in time. Is it rotten? Is it broken? Is it not broken but no longer useful to us?

It is the last moment that I find most interesting. What causes us to cross the threshold of dispossession for an item that is still functional? Why do we consider something that is functional a waste? I would imagine part of it must be socio-economic in nature. Those with enough money to buy new items allow them to eliminate the value of the older item as soon as the new item is purchased.

Part of it is the nature of society that in a general sense is affluent. We have been taught commercially motivated obsolesce. Everything has a shelf life. Things do not get fixed anymore. It is less expensive to buy a replacement. Even if it is not broken we are encouraged and happily comply to buy a replacement.

The dispossessed items need to find a new home and as discussed in yesterday’s blog post it is often, maybe always, easier to dispose of these items than find a new home for it. The dispossessed item has no value to us so why would we want to expend any effort to allow others to recoup the economic value of the item. We are not really or certainly not always altruistic creatures.

What struck me today were the old doors, windows, lumber and other functional hardware that could still be used. It has lost its value once I see it at an audit. It arrives at the auditing floor often mangled and tangled with other wastes which must be pried away to collect accurate data.

As always there is another solution.

I have had the opportunity to serve on the Board of Directors of Habitat for Humanity in London, Ontario and learned firsthand about the Restore operations http://www.habitat.ca/en/community/restores. These stores accept quality new and used building supplies. As with Goodwill Industries the inherent economic value is put to good use. Simply put the money raised goes to local affiliates who use it to build houses that become homes for families that would otherwise not have this opportunity.

We sometimes like to throw around the term “triple bottom line” when assessing and evaluating waste management options. It focuses on economics, environment and social aspects. Our extra efforts to keep these wastes out of the garbage stream are manifest as a social benefit. More simply put it is a tax free way to help people in need (i.e. the dollars are raised from our dispossessed items rather than our taxes).

While people that generate these items need to be challenged to make use of options such as Restore the other challenge is to make sure people know about these opportunities and that somehow we work towards making these options closer to the convenience level of disposal.


Some extra information on Habitat for Humanity's Restore

ReStore


ReStores are building supply stores run by Habitat for Humanity affiliates that accept and resell quality new and used building materials. Shopping at a ReStore is a socially conscious decision, as funds generated are used to fund Habitat homebuilding projects. As well, shopping at a ReStore is also an environmentally conscious decision, as much of what is sold at ReStores is product that is new, gently used or customer returns that would otherwise end up in a landfill.

From humble beginnings in Winnipeg, Manitoba, when five volunteers created the ReStore concept and opened the first store 20 years ago, there are now 65 ReStores located across Canada with hundreds more in the United States.


Find the ReStore location nearest you.

What types of products can I expect to find at a ReStore?
Every Habitat for Humanity ReStore is different and offers a unique shopping experience. The inventory is always changing, as items are donated daily by corporate and private donors. You can expect to find items such as windows, doors, paint, hardware, lumber, tools, lighting fixtures, and appliances.

What type of items can be donated to a ReStore?
Commonly donated items include windows, doors, paint, hardware, lumber, tools, lighting fixtures and appliances. Contact your nearest ReStore to determine if what you have can be donated to your local store.

How can I get items to the ReStore?
Items can be brought directly to your local ReStore. If you are unable to bring an item to your ReStore due to its size, the ReStore may be able to arrange a time to pick up the items from your home.

How does shopping at and donating to ReStores help the environment?
When a retailer has goods that can no longer be sold in store, they are often sent to a landfill. Thus, donating end-of-line products and customer returns to a ReStore can substantially reduce waste. In 2010, ReStores across Canada diverted 20,000 tonnes of material from landfills. Individuals can also help to reduce waste by donating items of value that might otherwise be thrown out.

What happens to the money generated by ReStores?
The profits generated by ReStores are used to fund the local affiliate that operates the store. Charities, like any other organization, incur administrative fees and ReStore profits help to cover these costs. As a result, money raised by the affiliate by conventional means, such as through individual and corporate giving, can go directly towards local builds and providing more families in the community with safe, decent and affordable housing.

For more information, contact your nearest ReStore or:
Rob Voisin
Director, ReStore Services
(519) 885-4565 x237

July 5, 2011

Where There is a Will There is a Goodwill

My company 2cg, among other things, undertakes waste audits for the private and public sectors. We have been doing this for the last 20 years. Typically, I send out an able crew to undertake these audits.

Every once in a while when we are busy or I want to get in touch with things I’ll don a Tyvek suit and dig in so to speak. While waste auditing is no one’s favourite job I find that it quickly puts me in tune with what people throw out.

In my latest waste audit I am noticing that people throw out a considerable amount of durable goods and clothing. While we certainly don’t assess the quality of these items during the waste audits it is clear that some if not all of these wastes have some value. Indeed some of these wastes have a monetary value. The value of course is lost when it is thrown away.

Unless we are a hoarder when we generate garbage we feel this need to get rid of it as quickly and conveniently as possible. I suppose this is fair enough but it often means the garbage bag to be placed at the curb or dropped off at a depot. This is convenient but inefficient.

Of course there are options.

I sit on the Board of Directors for Goodwill Industries Inc. (Great Lakes) and have done so for the last five years. When I started with them I thought what many of us think... a place to drop off unwanted goods and a place to buy inexpensive items.

It is important to understand that each donation helps hire and employ people. It helps employ some folks that have some challenges entering and staying in the workforce. It gives people the time to identify and understand their own skills. It gives people the opportunities to work on their challenges and in turn set themselves up for new opportunities. The only cost is some waste.

The durable goods and clothing in the wastes that I audited represent lost opportunities.

With a little bit more effort and taking these wastes to a Goodwill Donation Centre their value can be converted into cash and then jobs.

To find out how much your donation is worth and to find the location closest to you please see http://locator.goodwill.org/

July 4, 2011

The politics of asbestos

This article from the Globe and Mail provides a pretty good overview of the politics around Canadian asbestos mining and exports.

My own position is that I'm okay with asbestos mining (in itself) if the conditions for workers are safe. White Chrysotile is safer than the highly friable brown material that used to be used in insulation. Like many other people, my main concern is that our country exports asbestos for use in products and materials (e.g., concrete pipe) to countries where safety standards for handling the material may be negligible. Canada joined with just four other countries (Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam) in opposing the addition of asbestos to a list of dangerous substances under the Rotterdam Convention. (The calibre of Canada's partners in this move speaks volumes.) Adding asbestos to the list might harm marketing efforts, but would not lead to the strict banning of the material; instead, Canada would simply have to obtain acknowledgement from the receiving country that it understands the risks associated with the material. As the article below implies, it's very odd that Canada is engaging in this kind of boosterism for a dangerous industry/product that employs so few people. Keep the product legal, perhaps, but help ensure its safe use around the world.

Here's the article:

Workplace safety

Even the dying and the doctor support chrysotile mining in Asbestos

JULIAN SHER and BILL CURRY

ASBESTOS, QUE. AND OTTAWA— From Saturday's Globe and Mail

Published Friday, Jul. 01, 2011 10:45PM EDT

Last updated Saturday, Jul. 02, 2011 11:44AM EDT

Donald Nicholls remembers when the white fibres from the open pit mine that still dominates this town blanketed its streets like snow.

“You could leave tracks from the dust that fell overnight,” said Mr. Nicholls who started working in the mine fresh out of high school back in 1950. “It was much, much worse back then.”

He’s slowly dying of asbestosis, a respiratory disease brought on by inhaling those white particles. But like almost everyone else in town, the 79-year-old supports the reopening of the mine, allowing Canada to ramp up its export of chrysotile asbestos – a variant of the very mineral that is killing him.

In the face of widespread international hostility, Canada too has become an unabashed proponent of exporting a product linked to lung disease and cancer. The Conservative government’s decision last week to block an international agreement to restrict the sale of chrysotile incited condemnation around the world and across the country.

The Canadian Cancer Society called it an “unethical decision” that left it “shocked and embarrassed.”

So far, none of this appears to faze the Prime Minister. Asked about the backlash, his spokesman, Dimitri Soudas, would not explain Mr. Harper’s thinking on the issue. “The government’s policy position is clear,” he said in an e-mail.

Conservatives and the mine industry insist chrysotile – white asbestos used mainly to reinforce cement – is safe if handled properly, compared to the much more toxic brown asbestos used in insulation.

Beyond that, it’s a position the Tories don’t want to talk about or explain.

On the face it, the economics of the struggling industry in terms of jobs and exports hardly seems worth the international black eye. Those who see crass politics at play point to the electoral map. The surprise wave that elected 59 NDP MPs in Quebec reduced the Conservative base to a group of five ridings south of the St. Lawrence that includes the asbestos region.

Conservatives campaigned as defenders of Quebec’s regional interests. Supporting asbestos fits with that theme.

Meanwhile, many in Asbestos, a town of 7,000 people 180 kilometres east of Montreal, feel they are under siege.

“They say we are exporting death, but that is not true,” said Bernard Coulombe, the owner of the Jeffrey Mine and a tireless booster of its products. “They treat it like it was anthrax. If it was really as dangerous as they say it is, we’d all be lying dead in the streets. Why is the world against us?”

Last month, Mr. Coulombe himself was savagely skewered on Jon Stewart’s much-watched The Daily Show, called a “douchebag” and told that the word “asbestos” in English means “slow, hacking death.”

The World Health Organization and a slew of international scientists have declared that exposure to all forms of asbestos poses too great a risk for workers and the public.

Closer to home, a coalition of Quebec environmental groups last week called for a shutdown of the mines here and in nearby Thetford Mines that are at “the root of an epidemic of deaths around the world.”

Instead, the Quebec Liberal government has given Mr. Coulombe a $58-million loan guarantee to help find new investors.

And on June 24, the federal Conservative government sided with Vietnam, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan at a summit in Switzerland to successfully block the inclusion of asbestos on a United Nations list of hazardous materials.

“We don’t want to be on a banned list, that would bring shame for us,” said Mr. Coulombe, who started as an engineer in the mine in the 1960s and bought the declining operation in 1991 with hopes of bringing back its glory days of earlier decades.

Much stricter safety controls are in place in the Canadian mines today, but industry opponents say all Canada has done is export its problems – to countries like India where workplace standards for health and safety can be negligible.